Posts tagged abortion
Tea in tiny jars and paper cones
Look! I maed a tumblr.
Something that apparently needs to be clarified
Pro-choicers do not believe a fetus is a PART of a pregnant person’s body.
Pro-choicers DO know a fetus is INSIDE of a pregnant person’s body.
It’s “my body, my choice,” because what goes and stays inside of my body is MY body and MY choice. Not because I think the fetus IS my body.
(via antichoicescreencaps)
This is a picture from an old obstetrics textbook. I bet if you took away the text beneath it, you could convince people this is how doctors perform late term abortions. Sadly, this is what happens with a lot of anti-choice propaganda. A totally unrelated image is used to depict abortion—and people believe what they see.
Yeah, for sure.
I mean just look at his moustache.
Clearly evil.
An anti-choice graphic.
I also think it’s time you stopped saying that, but for different reasons.
An anti-choice community attacks on of their own because he does not believe in God.
How many times will this image be used? NO ONE LOOKED LIKE THIS AT 12 WEEKS.
fetuses are not just smaller versions of infants
fetuses are not just smaller versions of infants
fetuses are not just smaller versions of infants
fetuses are not just smaller versions of infants
If you think abortions ok, remember what Horton says.
Awkward. Dr. Seuss and his wife were really liberal and pro-choice. They’ve even threatened to sue pro-life organizations for using this quote the wrong way (the way you’re doing it actually). I guess you didn’t already know that Horton Hears a Who is about the American occupation of Japan post-WWII. He even dedicated it to his dear Japanese friend.
Mrs. Geisel (Mrs. Seuss) continued donating to Planned Parenthood and advocating for reproductive health and rights after her husband died.
Mrs. Seuss died before her husband? She killed herself because she was very painfully Ill. *i can’t insert pictures on mobile but pretend that more you know star picture is here*
thank you. that just shows they lied to prove their point. just like demis to lie.
Umm…
-Mrs. Seuss died after her husband.
-Mrs. Seuss is a long time reproductive healthcare and rights advocate.
Click here for proof! It’s from an icky pro-life source!
And that’s really rude of you to accuse Demi of being a liar.
An anti-choicer claims that consent to sex is consent to dying from pregnancy related complications.
What the actual fuck.
Blogger’s commentary: Great, that’s cool. Of those ten families, how many of them are queer? Interracial? Non-religious? If I had a child to give up for adoption, they would not be going to a straight, white, psychotic, Christian couple associated with AHA.
^Yup.
And how many of those 10 families are willing to adopt an already born kid out of the foster system?
Oh wait, I forgot, fetuses are way more important than them.
Tea in tiny jars and paper cones: The one word that can destroy all arguments for abortion
Adoption
HA! You’re pretty arrogant thinking you have the one true argument that can destroy every pro-choice argument ever.
Hey, isn’t pride one of those deadly sins? Better watch that…
Pride in the sense of vanity and I…
You make it sound like a child in the womb isn’t alive. It is in fact a living human being, not a corpse or something less than human. It is human.
I don’t believe I ever said anything like that. The comparisons I was making were also live people (who are indisputably persons, philosophically speaking). Fetuses are obviously human. There is a debate over whether or not they are persons. But even if they were, it wouldn’t matter. My point is that you want fetuses to have more rights than any person on the planet. Rights that would almost entirely impose on women, I should mention.
I do not want to impose anything on anyone. The right to life is what I want for a fetus, that is all and that is something that everyone is entitled to, whether they be a fetus in the womb or someone diagnosed with a malignant tumor.
So you also believe in forced organ donation as well as forced childbirth?
If I get kidney disease and need a transplant or I will die, and there are no willing donors who are a match, a doctor can forcibly take a kidney from someone in order to save me? Because my right to life trumps their right to bodily autonomy. Or does that only apply to fetuses?
That is not what I said! You people are skewing my words! The right to life means from conception to natural death. If you can’t find a willing kidney donor, you still have a right to keep looking for someone who will willingly give up their kidney for you.
In the case of rape, the percentage of abortion because of rape is less than 1%. While I agree that rape is wrong on so many levels, the child that has cone out of it is completely innocent and yet you would rather have the mother get an abortion than put the father on death row. Therefore you are punishing the baby for something it didn’t do.
I’m not skewing your words, I’m asking a question that is directly related to your argument.
And I never mentioned the case of rape. Abortion is not about punishing a fetus, it’s about the bodily autonomy of a pregnant person. Which, you have now admitted, is less important than anyone else’s bodily autonomy. So clearly, you think a fetus does deserve more rights than a pregnant person. To you, a fetus is more of a person than a woman. Women (and others who can get pregnant) don’t get the same rights to bodily autonomy that everyone else gets, even if they haven’t been born and arguably aren’t a person yet.
Tea in tiny jars and paper cones: The one word that can destroy all arguments for abortion
Adoption
HA! You’re pretty arrogant thinking you have the one true argument that can destroy every pro-choice argument ever.
Hey, isn’t pride one of those deadly sins? Better watch that…
Pride in the sense of vanity and I…
You make it sound like a child in the womb isn’t alive. It is in fact a living human being, not a corpse or something less than human. It is human.
I don’t believe I ever said anything like that. The comparisons I was making were also live people (who are indisputably persons, philosophically speaking). Fetuses are obviously human. There is a debate over whether or not they are persons. But even if they were, it wouldn’t matter. My point is that you want fetuses to have more rights than any person on the planet. Rights that would almost entirely impose on women, I should mention.
I do not want to impose anything on anyone. The right to life is what I want for a fetus, that is all and that is something that everyone is entitled to, whether they be a fetus in the womb or someone diagnosed with a malignant tumor.
So you also believe in forced organ donation as well as forced childbirth?
If I get kidney disease and need a transplant or I will die, and there are no willing donors who are a match, a doctor can forcibly take a kidney from someone in order to save me? Because my right to life trumps their right to bodily autonomy. Or does that only apply to fetuses?
